Local-International Relations and the Recalibration of Peacebuilding Interventions Insights from the ‘Laboratory‘ of Bougainville and Beyond, INEF-Report 112
Boege, Volker / Rinck, Patricia / Debiel, Tobias
The report addresses the micro-level as a key dimension of post-conflict peacebuilding interventions, with a particular focus on the relationships and interactions of international and local actors. What changes do occur with regard to their perceptions, expectations, attitudes and activities in the course of interactions? Can we identify experiences and mechanisms that lead to a re-articulation of relationships and interactions and, consequently, a recalibration of the overall peacebuilding exercise, e.g. with regard to more (or less) cooperation, more (or less) mutual trust, more (or less) animosities and misunderstandings, and more (or less) legitimacy? These questions are addressed through an in-depth case study, at the core of which are narrative, problem-centred interviews with international and local actors who were and/or are engaged in the peacebuilding process on Bougainville. Bougainville is regarded as a kind of ‘laboratory’ in which international/local relations and interactions are rather direct, because national institutions play a relatively small role, and external actors are present upon invitation not only by national, but also local actors. The exploration of the Bougainville case is complemented by a plausibility probe in a case with contrasting conditions, Sierra Leone.
Terrorism: Undefinable and Out-of-Context? Reconceptionalizing Terrorism as a Context-Specific Tactical Tool, INEF Report 111
Terrorism studies have developed since the 1970s. But the research field still suffers from several weaknesses: the inability to formulate a consensus on what exactly “terrorism” is; the vagueness and arbitrariness of the practical usage of the term “terrorism”; its politicization and the habit to use it as a moral label instead as an analytical tool; and the tendency to use the term outside of any political context. This study firstly reconsiders these conceptual weaknesses, and proposes how to deal with them. Secondly, it suggests to focus terrorism studies more on the political contexts, which produce domestic and international terrorism, by using the key example of terrorism resulting from a context of civil wars and insurgencies. The study argues that terrorism is not an ideology, not a type of warfare, rarely a strategy, but mostly a tactical instrument, which has to be analyzed in the respective political contexts.
Assessing Business-Related Impacts on Human Rights. Indicators and Benchmarks in Standards and Practice, INEF-Report 110
With a view to informing the policies and practices of states, business enterprises, and other stakeholders towards universal corporate respect for human rights, this study proposes principled and practical indicators to support the assessment of human rights impacts with which business enterprises may be involved. The study identifies a wide array of contexts in which application of the proposed indicators would help to strengthen state approaches to protecting rights-holders against business-related harm in terms of law, policy, regulation, adjudication and participation in multilateral, international and regional organizations. The study also presents a practical methodology for how the proposed indicators can strengthen current private sector approaches to implementing the corporate responsibility to respect human rights, particularly in terms of assessing the human rights risks and impacts that may be associated with core business operations and business relationships.
Human Rights Due Diligence through Stakeholder Engagement? The Case of a Copper-Gold Mine in the Philippines, INEF-Report 109
Hamm, Brigitte / Schax, Anne
The INEF Report 109 examines to what extent stakeholder engagement as a form of private governance can contribute to a corporation’s human rights due diligence performance. It takes as the basis for investigation a case study of a stakeholder engagement program implemented by the operating company SMI for a planned copper-gold mine in the Philippines during the project’s pre-operational phase. The analysis examines criteria for good stakeholder engagement set out by the International Finance Corporation (IFC) and uses the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as the conceptual framework. For the case investigated here, it is established that SMI’s stakeholder engagement program and the guidelines have several shortcomings from a human rights perspective, which in turn negatively affect other due diligence processes.
A (Mis)alignment of Governance Structures? The Two Water Concessions in Metro Manila, INEF-Report 108
Improving the quality of water services is vital in many developing countries. In order to address the issue, many of them launched a series of reforms of which a major element was the involvement of the private sector. However, private sector participation (PSP) did not prove to be a general panacea. In some cases it has led to improved water service quality, such as increased access and reduced water losses. In other cases it has resulted in deteriorated performance, including high tariffs and potentially negative impacts on health and the environment. The question is under which circumstances PSP can positively or negatively impact on the provision of water services. This INEF Report analyses the varying performance of the two water concessions in Metro Manila through the lens of the theory of Transaction Cost Economics (TCE). It shows that a misalignment of governance structures (organisational constructs) according to the level of transaction costs leads to worse water service provision.